Comparing Secure Messaging: Session vs Signal Technology Overview

In the realm of secure messaging apps, ensuring privacy and security is paramount. Two contenders, Session and Signal, offer robust platforms for secure communications, each with its own unique approach. While Signal has long been revered as an industry standard, Session emerges as a novel player with a different technological blueprint. This comparative analysis delves into the core technical frameworks of Session and Signal, shedding light on how each app navigates the challenging terrain of ensuring user privacy and secure messaging.

 

1. Network Design:

  • Session's Decentralized Architecture: Session operates on a decentralized network using the Oxen blockchain. Unlike traditional centralized models, there are no central servers that route messages. Instead, the app utilizes an onion routing network similar to Tor, comprising thousands of independent nodes that facilitate message delivery. This decentralized model is  reducing trust requirements and potential censorship points.
  • Signal's Centralized Architecture: Signal operates on a centralized server model, where servers managed by the Signal Foundation route the messages between users. While this model can be efficient and fast, it does have a single point of failure, and if Signal's servers were to go down or be blocked in a region, the service would be unavailable.

 

2. Encryption Protocols:

Session:

  • End-to-End Encryption (E2E): Session uses end-to-end encryption to secure communications. This means that messages are encrypted on the sender's device and only decrypted on the recipient's device, ensuring that no one, not even the service provider, can access the message content while it's in transit​. However, the specific encryption protocol has not been mentioned.
Signal:
  • Signal Protocol: Signal employs its own encryption protocol known as the Signal Protocol, which is also end-to-end encrypted. It combines the Double Ratchet Algorithm, prekeys, and a triple Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman (3-DH) handshake. It's a well-regarded protocol used by other messaging services like WhatsApp and Skype to secure communications.

 

3. Metadata Handling:

Session:

  • Minimal Metadata Exposure: Session is designed to expose the absolute minimum amount of metadata. It doesn’t require an email address or phone number for account creation, and it doesn’t collect or store metadata about user communications. A random Session ID is generated for each user that is disconnected from personal information​.

Signal:

  • Sealed Sender Technology: Signal also takes steps to minimize metadata exposure through its "Sealed Sender" technology, which helps to hide the sender's identity from Signal servers. However, Signal does require a phone number to create an account, which ties a user's identity to their account.

 

4. User Anonymity:

Session:

  • No Personal Information Required: Session doesn’t require any personal information for account creation, enhancing user anonymity​.

Signal:

  • Phone Number Required: Signal requires a phone number to create an account, which could potentially be a point of data linkage to a user's identity.

 

5. Open Source:

Both Session and Signal are open source, allowing for community scrutiny and contributions to their codebases, which enhances transparency and trust.

 

The comparative lens between Session and Signal reveals a landscape where both apps strive for heightened security and user privacy, albeit through different technical avenues. Session’s decentralized model, bolstered by minimal metadata exposure and user anonymity, presents a novel approach towards secure communications. On the flip side, Signal's well-established, centralized model with a trusted encryption protocol continues to be a reliable choice for many.

Understanding the technological underpinnings of these apps provides a nuanced perspective for users seeking a secure messaging platform that aligns with their privacy preferences. In the evolving domain of secure messaging, both Session and Signal contribute significantly, each carving a distinct path towards achieving communication security in the digital age.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.